2019 Best Transportation Management System (TMS) Software Packages
Managed transportation services continue to be the #1 topic we talk with shippers about as they look to optimize their supply chain performance against the challenging backdrop of rising freight rates, tight truck capacity, along with changing and more challenging customer requirements.
As we work our way through the discussion of managed TM, we invariably are asked what we believe are the best transportation management software (TMS) platforms in the industry, which we also have conversations on as a referral partner of the MercuryGate TMS and an integrator for the software.
To help buyers through their TMS selection process of upgrading their supply chain technology, we want to be as transparent and upfront as possible on the other TMS software options so they can work through what system will be the best fit for them because there is not a one size fits all answer on the topic.
With that said, let’s go through the list and then have a short discussion on how to assemble a requirements document.
Top 13 Transportation Management Systems (TMS)
- Cloud Logistics
Best Transportation Management Systems (TMS)
Headquarters: Shelton, Connecticut
This is an up and coming name in the industry. Partners with TMW to fill out some of its capabilities. Primarily North American focused. Their customer base is primarily small to medium-sized shippers and 3PL’s. It does not support rail and international air & ocean at this time, but would not be surprised if it is on the radar.
Headquarters: Manchester, UK
Summary: Offers a stand-alone TMS and managed TM services. Robust capabilities with both domestic and international capabilities. Other BluJay supply chain execution packages available to plug-in-play into the TMS. Customer base leans toward mid-sized shippers and 3PL’s, although has the capabilities support larger shippers.
Headquarters: West Palm Beach, Florida
Another up and comer in the industry. Primarily domestic truckload focused. Rail, international ocean and air are not available at this time, although they continue to add to their functionality. Total cost of ownership (TCO) is relatively low.
Headquarters: Waterloo, Canada
Summary: Offers a stand-alone TMS and managed TM services. Robust capabilities with both domestic and international capabilities for shippers and 3PL’s supporting all freight modes. TCO is relatively competitive.
Headquarters: Scottsdale, Arizona
Summary: Largest independent SCM suite vendor. Robust platform for large complex shippers and third party logistics companies. Handles global supply chain requirements. Total cost of ownership (TCO) is high in comparison to other TMS platforms.
Headquarters: Maynard, Massachusetts
Summary: TMS was built on Salesforce platform. Large customer base, with many smaller shippers because of its freemium TMS offering. Primarily a TMS software company, but does offers managed TM services off their TMS platform. Mainly US focused with domestic and international capabilities. Continue to build on its capabilities. TCO is competitive.
Headquarters: Atlanta, Georgia
Strong history going back almost three decades. TMS comes out of the box with integrations into the Manhattan supply chain applications. Sold more as an add-on to their WMS. TCO is relatively high.
Headquarters: Cary, North Carolina
Summary: Customer base primarily North American oriented. A robust platform that supports domestic and international modes of freight for companies of all sizes. Continues to add to its capabilities. Cost of ownership is competitive. Buyers need to be aware of the flexibility and maximize it versus custom coding. TMS supports 3PL, broker, shipper and private fleet companies.
Headquarters: Redwood Shores, California
Summary: Robust platform for large complex shippers and third party logistics companies, although working its way into medium sized shippers and 3PL’s. Handles global supply chain requirements very well. TCO is high in comparison to other TMS platforms.
Headquarters: Walldorf, Germany
Summary: Robust platform that has integration with its ERP and SCM product software. Robust platform for medium and large complex shippers and 3PL’s. Handles global supply chain requirements well. Partners with Descartes for some of its functionality with carrier communication. TCO is high versus the various TMS platforms.
TMC. Division of CH Robinson
Headquarters: Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Summary: TMS and TMC came about through building the software to support its brokerage division. Robust TMS with plenty of capabilities to support all modes of domestic and international freight. Both a standalone TMS and managed TM solution, although more known for its strong managed TM service. Pricing can be confusing for standalone TMS users, so ask the questions and vet thoroughly. Focused on medium to large shippers. TCO is relatively mid to high range.
Headquarters: Cleveland, Ohio
Summary: Robust TMS with an ability to support non-asset and internal fleet for shippers and 3PL’s, although tend to find the solution more in carriers and brokers. Primarily North American domestic focused.
Headquarters: Dallas, Texas
More known for their managed TM option, but moving quickly sell their TMS as a standalone platform. North American focused with domestic and international capabilities, although international is through a partnership. TCO is reported to be relatively competitive. Medium to large shipper customer base.
TMS Requirements Document
With the top transportation management systems outlined, it is imperative for buyers to assemble a requirements document to make an objective decision. Too often we see companies make their decision on the flash and excitement, which causes them to make a suboptimal decision.
There are plenty of TMS requirements documents out there and we’ve listed a couple from the top TMS companies listed above:
The documents are a great start, which you will want to expand upon, with one being placing a rating of 1 to 10 next to each requirement based on how important it is to your company. The importance of the numbering is it will help in the objective decision when all the responses come in because it will give you an overall score of “fit for your company”.
There are two points to the scoring that need to be followed: it must be done before the requirements document goes out and the TMS vendors should not see the ratings until after they have filled it out. Missing either may drive an unintended bias after the fact.
Outline of Functionality to Include in a TMS Requirements Document:
Inbound, Outbound and Intercompany
Modes of Freight Supports
Domestic & International Capabilities
Technology Architecture, meaning Cloud or Mainframe
Ease of Integration
Supports Spreadsheets, FTP, EDI, XML or OCR of other Documents
Capture of Freight Specifications
How Many Fields and Flexibility
Support PO’s for Inbound Management
Rating and Contracts
Freight Sourcing and Bid RFP Optimization Tools
Modes Supported - Domestic and International
Carrier Freight Rating and Contract Management
Integration to Load Boards
Ability to Turn Quotes Immediately to Loads
Strategic and Tactical Planning
Analytical Tools for Strategic Planning
Daily Execution Tactical Planning
Operational Planning and Execution
Freight Order Management
Consolidation, Pooling and Stop-Offs
Daily Operational Optimization and Planning
Carrier Assignment and Communication
Data to be Considered in Optimization
Can Optimization be Immediately Move to Execution
Dedicated Fleet Optimization with Non-Asset Requirements
Reporting and Visibility
Track & Trace
Exception Alerts & Reporting
Assign and Brand to Customer
Assign by User ID
Freight Audit, Payment and Settlement
Support OCR for Carrier Invoices and Document Management
Electronic, Email, EDI, Mail, Etc.
Configurable and Flexible Reporting
Advanced to Support Strategic Analytics
After all the responses are received, you’ll need to go through the findings and ask your questions on the items that were of high importance, yet not base functionality in the TMS. The key points of diving further into the discovery process with the TMS suppliers are:
Will the software provider be able to build custom code.
How much will it cost?
Are they willing to put it into base code?
This point is often missed, but extremely important. The reason being is if the code is not put into base code any upgrades the TMS provider does in the next release may be difficult and costly for you to follow the upgrade. Fall behind too far in the upgrade cycle and your TMS will quickly be outdated and therefore uncompetitive.
Once you get through to the top 3 vendors, you’ll want to demo and further refine your decision.
Through the entire process ask the questions that will:
Give you the complete picture of the total cost of ownership.
Give you a full understanding of the customers that they work best with and want in the portfolio.
Let you to really get to know the people you will be working with during the integration and for long-term support and where they are taking their platform into the future.
Give you an overall comfort that you are making the correct decision for your team and the company you’re bringing the solution to for both now and into the future.
- What does the TMS implementation process look like?
- How long will it take before your company will begin realizing the benefits?
After all, you really need to look at a TMS software and any software selection that drives an operation as a marriage because the correct decision will drive a mutually beneficial and successful relationship many years into the future of your business, while a separation will be both painful and costly.
Hopefully, you found the above information to be helpful. We’d love to be a part of your transportation management software (TMS) selection and / or managed transportation services discussions, so please keep us in mind.